A study of Brexit voting

In 2016 the UK was given the referendum vote, which 4 years on is still courting controversy. According to the following research, Brexit has also brought about a certain arrogance, narcissistic, uncaring approach, one that may have not been there before, and if it was, it wasn’t obvious.

Scientists from the UK, Poland and Portugal have looked at xenophobia around Brexit and have since measured the effect of xenophobia on voting behaviour and found that it was strongly related to voting in favour of Brexit.

Now the results of a new study into voting behaviours of people who voted for the UK to leave the European Union show a worrying trend, partly driven by narcissism, regardless of their level of education, age, or gender.

The research, published in Frontiers in Psychology, identified collective narcissism as being a new voting variable. British citizens who fear immigrants and thought they threatened their values and way of life were more likely to have voted in favour of the UK, leaving the EU.

Led by Dr Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, from Goldsmiths, University of London, the researchers then looked to establish what kind of people believe immigrants may threaten the UK.

The study showed three distinct groups: authoritarians, who fear other groups will threaten the status quo; people who compete for their group’s dominance over immigrants and collective narcissists; who believe the UK is entitled to privileged treatment but complain this ‘true importance and value’ is not recognised by other countries. Importantly, the research also found people who valued their British identity were not more likely to reject immigrants or vote for Brexit.

The study’s author said the research introduces collective narcissism as a new variable to consider when making predictions for political behaviour. She said “From Brexit, Trump and support for Vladimir Putin in Russia to the nationalist, ultra- conservative government in Poland, studies from our and other labs show that collective narcissism systematically predicts prejudice, aggression and a tendency to interpret innocent behaviours as provocation to the national group.

“Collective narcissism isn’t a good attitude and we need to study how this may become a group norm so that we can find ways of preventing it from happening and spreading. We should vet our leaders more carefully in this respect, because leaders have the power to make such attitudes normative in their groups.”

The researchers also have suggested that as the study was conducted after the referendum, it may be that the ‘yes’ vote increased xenophobia, which made them feel more empowered to express xenophobic attitudes.


Studies are there to give us an insight into things that can make our life better, us better. If you understand how and why Brexit happened, you will know it was brought about through politcal narcissism. It wasn’t an informed choice because it was a good idea. In fact the opposite is true.

The architect of the Brexit referendum was advised by the German Chancellor not to give the British People the vote. The rest is now assigned to the UK history books. If we can learn one thing from Brexit is that politician’s attitudes must change for the greater good, so that we may all come together.

Those responsible and instrumental for Brexit have lessons to learn. The question now is will those lessons be learned?

Source: https://www.thelondoneconomic.com

27 Nov, 2020

2 thoughts on “A study of Brexit voting

  1. Thank you for putting blogs like this out. They are really informative and important blogs. There has certainly been a shift in the UK, from the previous centre left administration to a much more hard right form of conservatism in response to the UK’s departure form the EU.

    I believe the referendum was a mistake. The pro Brexiteers fed a narrow minded form of populism and nationalism which had been ‘bubbling’ under for many years and has now led to a form of government, which is also worrying on the increase across Europe.

    I sometimes think the UK is no place for me if this form of politics continues, especially when I see how well other countries can govern. Where the social and economic welfare of the population actually matter, rather than the right wing political agendas of the few.

    1. When I first started my blog 10 years ago, the world didn’t look like it does now. The world has become a scary and uncertain place.

      Dealing with autism, I feel better when I am able to write about what I see, in the way I see it, as well as bringing the facts into it.

      I agree with you. The conservative party are a populist government. But even if the government were to admit they got the vote wrong, it has now gone too far to pull back.

      In the meantime, people are losing their jobs, the economy is in its boots; the world thinks the UK has lost the plot, and there is a talk of shortages of medicines once we’re out, which could lead to more untimely deaths, now also in a pandemic.

      Innocent people are getting caught up in the cross-fire. I will always sow a seed hoping it brings about positive change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.