The Covid-19 Vaccine/2

Today’s blog is a continuation to ‘The Covid-19 Vaccine’ Blog. Professor Herb Sewell is convinced it is because the medicine was specifically designed to be given at specific times in two stages. The first dose is what’s known as the ‘primer,’ stimulating so-called ‘memory cells.’

The second inoculation triggers a longer lasting immune response. New data coming from Israel, following up 200,000 cases of people who were given a first jab of the Pfizer vaccine show that after 14 days, their antibody levels reduced very quickly, leaving two-thirds of them still vulnerable to infection.

While manufacturer conducted trials before the vaccine was approved and concluded that the first jab would give better than 50 per cent immunity, those trials were done with people of all ages, whereas it is the over 70s who are most at risk.

In this real-world situation, between 30-50% immunity was the best achievable from a single inoculation. On this basis the UK Government has got it wrong as they claim that one jab offers 89% immunity. This assumption was based on past experience with vaccines, rather than data.

Indeed, the vaccine makers themselves, have never claimed a single inoculation would be adequate. That decision has been made by politicians, who saw that the vaccine would be in short supply to begin with and decided to spread it thinly.

They thought that, by delaying the second dose, they could double the coverage of the vaccinations, in an uncontrollable pandemic.


Professor Herb Sewell isn’t convinced that what the UK Government will work and think it has made a strategic mistake.

Given we have data on the original testing that jabs be staged 3 weeks apart and there is no data for this 12 week delay, this approach is clearly a massive gamble that may not pay off. We’ll have to wait on that.


20 Feb, 2021

2 thoughts on “The Covid-19 Vaccine/2

  1. I’m still not quite sure as to why they would want to delay the second dose, but since they are, they’re ignoring the science.

    If they were doing things the way doctors have been recommending, I’m sure that things would have gotten better by now. The longer they wait, the more chances the virus will mutate and the vaccine will become ineffective.

    It’s like nobody has seen a pandemic movie that tells us what we should and shouldn’t do. We can only hope now that things get better instead of getting worse.

    1. Thanks Randy. Yes, I believe the government wanted to make sure more people had at least been vaccinated once, but in doing so they have spread themselves too thinly.

      But with what we know and with what leading scientists have asked, it looks like it may be the wrong decision. A gamble, that may or not pay off. I suspect it won’t pay off, until such a time there is data to suggest otherwise.

      The whole virus concept is difficult, made worse because of the incompetence of politicians who have sought to gamble with people’s lives, for underlying reasons only known to them.

Leave a Reply to Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.